Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Reversals and portents

  • May. 15th, 2008 at 4:46 PM
calvinhobbes santa spook
I ran across something unexpected while reading the CNN headlines earlier. It seems that Lori Drew is going to get what's coming to her after all. In case you don't recall, she was the mother from that myspace suicide case a while back. The last I had heard about it, a grand jury had been issuing subpeonas, but I never anticipated that the case would amount to much. It seemed that they were simply grasping at straws. Well, it looks like the prosecutor ended up hitting paydirt.

Mom indicted in deadly MySpace hoax

LOS ANGELES, California (AP) -- A federal grand jury indicted a Missouri woman Thursday for her alleged role in perpetrating a hoax on the online social network MySpace against a 13-year-old neighbor who committed suicide.

Lori Drew of suburban St. Louis is said to have helped create a false-identity MySpace account to contact Megan Meier, who thought she was chatting with a 16-year-old boy named Josh Evans. Josh didn't exist.

Megan hanged herself at home in October 2006 after receiving cruel messages, including one stating the world would be better off without her.

Salvador Hernandez, assistant agent in charge of the Los Angeles FBI office, called the case heart-rending.

"The Internet is a world unto itself. People must know how far they can go before they must stop. They exploited a young girl's weaknesses," Hernandez said. "Whether the defendant could have foreseen the results, she's responsible for her actions."

Drew was charged with one count of conspiracy and three counts of accessing protected computers without authorization to get information used to inflict emotional distress on the girl.

Drew has denied creating the account or sending messages to Megan.

U.S. Attorney Thomas P. O'Brien said this was the first time the federal statute on accessing protected computers has been used in a social-networking case. It has been used in the past to address hacking.

"This was a tragedy that did not have to happen," O'Brien said.

Both the girl and MySpace are named as victims in the case, he said.

MySpace is a subsidiary of Beverly Hills, California-based Fox Interactive Media Inc., which is owned by News Corp. The indictment noted that MySpace computer servers are located in Los Angeles County.

Due to juvenile privacy rules, the U.S. attorney's office said, the indictment refers to the girl as M.T.M.

FBI agents in St. Louis and Los Angeles investigated the case, Hernandez said.

Each of the four counts carries a maximum possible penalty of five years in prison.

Drew will be arraigned in St. Louis and then moved to Los Angeles for trial.

I don't really know how I feel about this case anymore. I agree that the mom was a douche and should have faced scorn but I just don't know if I believe there should be criminal charges. It's not exactly her fault that the girl was an unbalanced nutjob exactly. It'd be different if she had handed her the rope but I'm not sure it's exactly foreseeable that she would off herself.

The other aspect of this case that bothers me is the new information that's come out since that shows that it was Drew's 19 year old employee who actually created the account and also issued the fateful 'the world would be better off without you' message that is believed to have precipitated the suicide. I'm sure she was acting, at least to some degree, at Lori Drew's behest, but there's no reason she should have escaped being charged as well. With that information out there and the lack of other indictments, it just makes this look like a witch hunt. I'm also not sure that it bodes well to have this case as a precedent either.

Comments

(Anonymous) wrote:
May. 15th, 2008 09:49 pm (UTC)
My take
Lori Drew KNEW the girl was troubled. She pushed and pushed until the girl took the proverbal dive off the cliff. Lori knew what she was doing. It was intentional and malicious. It went way past bullying and she deserves to at least be called into court about it. If Missouri courts didn't have the balls to do it, at least the federal courts in CA DO.
[info]henwy wrote:
May. 15th, 2008 09:54 pm (UTC)
Re: My take
But the girl is the one ultimately responsible for taking the dive. Where's the personal responsibility? Most people in this world have been the target of bullying and the like. At some point, you just have to take responsibility for your own actions. Lori Drew's responsible for being a malicious bitch perhaps, but she's not responsible for the girl offing herself.
[info]mock26 wrote:
May. 16th, 2008 05:46 pm (UTC)
Re: My take
It doesn't matter if she knew what she was doing. Legally about the worst thing that she is guilty of is being a bully. That's it. I agree with Henwy on this one in that Lori Drew was a bitch (I'd call her a cunt), but there is no crime in that. At the end of it all, the young girl made the decision to buy the farm. She metaphorically "pulled the trigger." Lori Drew didn't even "put the gun in her hands." That young girl did.

Sadly, though, I think that given the general ignorance of the common folk (especially in a state like Missouri) that Lori Drew will be going away for a very long time.

Edited at 2008-05-16 05:48 pm (UTC)

Profile

domo
[info]henwy
In the darkness the trees are full of starlight

Latest Month

October 2008
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Tags

Page Summary

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Teresa Jones