In the darkness the trees are full of starlight (henwy) wrote,
In the darkness the trees are full of starlight

  • Mood:

Just because you're hung like a moose dosen't mean you have to do porn

So I was thinking about subject lines for entries. Should they be functional, so that if I'm searching for an entry some time later I can find it, or should they be in the stinky-fu mode of LJ'ing, which is to say weird yet sorta interesting. I mean, I've got plenty of funny little quotes and things that I think are quite amusing. For example: Actual stupidity will beat artifical intelligence every time. Now, I guess I could wait until I had an entry around where I'm comenting about, err, computers or maybe someone who was excessively stupid, or even better yet someone who is excessively stupid working with computers. The question is, how likely is that really to come up?

Now, the above subject line is another case in point. I could now make this entry about how some people just end up not liking the things they'd be best at, which is sorta sad if you think about it. Since that sorta topic dosen't apply to jack diddily crap at the moment, I'd almost have to go searching for an annecdote just so content matched. It's sorta odd since stinky is the only person who mentioned she even likes to reread old entries. God only knows how she manages to find specific ones. Maybe I should start using that tag system but it sorta pisses me off that it's only now avaliable almost two years in. I don't want to have to go back through god only knows how many entries adding freaking tags to everything and it seems sort of pointless to just start now.

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded